Timeline for Let's get critical: Mar 2014 Site Self-Evaluation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:54 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://movies.stackexchange.com/ with https://movies.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 16, 2014 at 17:15 | comment | added | iandotkelly Mod | @BleedingFingers - cool, thanks - just wanted to make sure there wasn't something I'd missed. | |
| Jun 16, 2014 at 17:12 | comment | added | Bleeding Fingers | @iandotkelly nahh, we are on the same page. Just dropped the link here as ref and for further reading on the matter. shog9's takes are usually interesting and provide good perspective. :) | |
| Jun 16, 2014 at 17:02 | comment | added | iandotkelly Mod | @BleedingFingers - err, I just want to be sure I understand what you are saying, as the post you link-to here makes the same point I make, I think :) | |
| Jun 16, 2014 at 16:49 | comment | added | Bleeding Fingers | @iandotkelly meta.stackexchange.com/q/60212/221866 | |
| Mar 29, 2014 at 22:14 | comment | added | iandotkelly Mod | Moderators have no ability to accept an answer on behalf of another user. | |
| Mar 29, 2014 at 17:49 | comment | added | Napoleon Wilson | This has always been a problem with SE sites and I'm not sure mods can do anything about it. It is hard to define when it is actually valid for a mod to accept an answer for another user's account and that would probably be too much power (I'm not saying mods are going to misuse that, just that it's hard to say when this is really 100% applicable). There is just nothing to be done than properly informing the users about how it works and hoping for them to internalize it. As much as we would like users to post "good" questions and answers, we would like them to know how the site works. | |
| Mar 28, 2014 at 21:49 | history | answered | Shiz Z. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |