Timeline for Do we fail to attract experts?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 4, 2020 at 15:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Apr 13, 2015 at 8:10 | answer | added | Catija | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 9, 2014 at 17:32 | history | edited | magnattic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
Jun 8, 2014 at 14:20 | comment | added | Meat Trademark | What I mean is it's not unheard of for workdays to be 14 or more hours, sometimes 7 days a week, and sometimes their bed is over an hour away. Plus, they have to eat and sleep in that small window away from set. It's not so much an issue of passion, but of time. | |
Jun 5, 2014 at 23:35 | comment | added | magnattic | I don't know. If someone really has a passion, its not uncommon to keep in touch with it after-hours as well. I don't know any filmmakers, so I can't really say if that's true for them as well, but I don't see why not. | |
Jun 5, 2014 at 23:06 | comment | added | Meat Trademark | I'd also add that most days of production are 10 or more hours and after the trek back to home-base, and having an early call for the next day, most filmmakers probably don't go to a Q & A site about movies to unwind. (Just a guess.) | |
Jun 5, 2014 at 22:27 | comment | added | DustinDavis | Already mentioned, but if this was a "film-making" SE then we'd probably get more experts, but movies & tv seems to be more about analysis of story-line & characters. I don't think we have any place for experts. | |
Jun 5, 2014 at 0:53 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackMovies/status/474353182613590016 | ||
Jun 3, 2014 at 7:34 | answer | added | Andrew Martin | timeline score: 2 | |
Jun 2, 2014 at 23:06 | answer | added | CGCampbell | timeline score: 6 | |
Jun 2, 2014 at 20:41 | answer | added | Kevin Howell | timeline score: 2 | |
Jun 2, 2014 at 20:01 | history | edited | magnattic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 799 characters in body
|
Jun 2, 2014 at 19:08 | comment | added | Napoleon Wilson | Related: meta.movies.stackexchange.com/q/174/49. | |
Jun 2, 2014 at 18:54 | comment | added | Napoleon Wilson | @AnkitSharma I'm not sure it suffices already (and am not too much in the mood to flesh it out for now), since I don't want to say that this question is completely without a valid premise. | |
Jun 2, 2014 at 18:53 | comment | added | Ankit Sharma Mod | @NapoleonWilson more suited as answer, +1. | |
Jun 2, 2014 at 18:51 | comment | added | Napoleon Wilson | While we do have some film-techniques questions, I think actual film-making experts are more at home on Video Production anyway, since Movies & TV seems more of a consumer site by nature. I'm not saying I wouldn't like any "experts" around here, but to be honest the experts of this site are not expert movie-makers, but expert movie watchers (however they're defined, though). | |
Jun 2, 2014 at 18:48 | history | asked | magnattic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |