Timeline for How to improve the problem with identification questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 11, 2016 at 23:15 | comment | added | Napoleon Wilson Mod | @RobertCartaino For your consideration: meta.movies.stackexchange.com/q/2250/49 | |
Mar 4, 2016 at 16:42 | comment | added | Napoleon Wilson Mod | @Insane Yeah, but new users don't. Your point being? | |
Feb 18, 2016 at 16:52 | history | edited | Robert Cartaino | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 26 characters in body
|
Feb 4, 2016 at 6:15 | comment | added | Insane | @RobertCartaino You know how to block the tag right? ;P | |
Jan 1, 2016 at 11:30 | comment | added | Mari-Lou A | I see this issue as being remarkably similar to the tag single-word-requests on EL&U, the plague or curse of that site, but it's nowhere near as bad as here. I am stunned by the number of posts that have the feeblest vaguest descriptions to movies I would never want to watch in the first place. Users should insist on fuller more detailed descriptions if they want this type of question to be allowed, otherwise start closing the bad ones, and asap. | |
Oct 21, 2015 at 8:35 | comment | added | Ankit Sharma Mod | @NapoleonWilson this one have more downvote then other. And i think this is the ultimate solution which we should go for. | |
Oct 21, 2015 at 8:29 | comment | added | Napoleon Wilson Mod | @AnkitSharma Well, all the answers already got downvotes, even the constructive pro-ID answer as well as the question, so apparently trying to improve anything is not the best idea anyway. ;-) | |
Oct 21, 2015 at 6:50 | comment | added | Ankit Sharma Mod | @NapoleonWilson I will also wait to see your answer as this one already started getting downvote :( . | |
Oct 20, 2015 at 18:17 | comment | added | Robert Cartaino | @NapoleonWilson If you decide to answer, I am looking forward to your response. | |
Oct 20, 2015 at 18:02 | history | edited | Robert Cartaino | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Oct 20, 2015 at 16:24 | history | edited | Robert Cartaino | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
Oct 20, 2015 at 16:15 | history | edited | Robert Cartaino | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
Oct 20, 2015 at 16:07 | history | edited | Robert Cartaino | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
Oct 20, 2015 at 15:07 | comment | added | Napoleon Wilson Mod | Well, if you ask that way, I was considering giving an answer with exactly that solution as a possibility, but it requires careful crafting and reasoning and putting my year long-ramblings into a coherent answer. Since the least thing to be desired is people downvoting a reasonable solution just because it's not particularly constructively and coherently worded or written like a mere rant. | |
Oct 20, 2015 at 14:49 | history | answered | Robert Cartaino | CC BY-SA 3.0 |