Skip to main content
replaced http://movies.stackexchange.com/ with https://movies.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

http://movies.stackexchange.com/questions/68362/70s-or-80s-movie-where-woman-has-healing-powers/68375#68375https://movies.stackexchange.com/questions/68362/70s-or-80s-movie-where-woman-has-healing-powers/68375#68375

So I don't get why after my question was answered, after it has received up-votes, and I verified with a YouTube link in a comment, that some people decide to take offense and mark the question as off-topic?

Seriously? I apparently provided enough information that somebody answered pretty quick (within a day?). The information I provided was pretty much all I remember as a kid when I saw this movie. But, I did provide a detail for a pretty meaningful scene near the end of the movie. The person answering the question specifically mentions that scene "really stuck with me".

I feel like if the question sat unanswered for days, then it might be ok to close it because the question is too vague. At the time of this post, not even 60 people saw the question. Yet here I sit with the answer to my question and I'm happy that "sfhq-sf" helped me out.

I get that stack exchange sites need to have moderators to keep the riff-raff from ruining everybody's favorite site, but give me a break! If somebody went the extra mile to help somebody else out, only to be rewarded by opinionated users admonishing the relevance of the question, then you're seriously going to lose users who genuinely want to help out AND lose users who really don't want to be told that their questions are not appreciated.

http://movies.stackexchange.com/questions/68362/70s-or-80s-movie-where-woman-has-healing-powers/68375#68375

So I don't get why after my question was answered, after it has received up-votes, and I verified with a YouTube link in a comment, that some people decide to take offense and mark the question as off-topic?

Seriously? I apparently provided enough information that somebody answered pretty quick (within a day?). The information I provided was pretty much all I remember as a kid when I saw this movie. But, I did provide a detail for a pretty meaningful scene near the end of the movie. The person answering the question specifically mentions that scene "really stuck with me".

I feel like if the question sat unanswered for days, then it might be ok to close it because the question is too vague. At the time of this post, not even 60 people saw the question. Yet here I sit with the answer to my question and I'm happy that "sfhq-sf" helped me out.

I get that stack exchange sites need to have moderators to keep the riff-raff from ruining everybody's favorite site, but give me a break! If somebody went the extra mile to help somebody else out, only to be rewarded by opinionated users admonishing the relevance of the question, then you're seriously going to lose users who genuinely want to help out AND lose users who really don't want to be told that their questions are not appreciated.

https://movies.stackexchange.com/questions/68362/70s-or-80s-movie-where-woman-has-healing-powers/68375#68375

So I don't get why after my question was answered, after it has received up-votes, and I verified with a YouTube link in a comment, that some people decide to take offense and mark the question as off-topic?

Seriously? I apparently provided enough information that somebody answered pretty quick (within a day?). The information I provided was pretty much all I remember as a kid when I saw this movie. But, I did provide a detail for a pretty meaningful scene near the end of the movie. The person answering the question specifically mentions that scene "really stuck with me".

I feel like if the question sat unanswered for days, then it might be ok to close it because the question is too vague. At the time of this post, not even 60 people saw the question. Yet here I sit with the answer to my question and I'm happy that "sfhq-sf" helped me out.

I get that stack exchange sites need to have moderators to keep the riff-raff from ruining everybody's favorite site, but give me a break! If somebody went the extra mile to help somebody else out, only to be rewarded by opinionated users admonishing the relevance of the question, then you're seriously going to lose users who genuinely want to help out AND lose users who really don't want to be told that their questions are not appreciated.

Source Link

I need help understanding why my "identify-this-movie" tagged question was marked "off-topic"

http://movies.stackexchange.com/questions/68362/70s-or-80s-movie-where-woman-has-healing-powers/68375#68375

So I don't get why after my question was answered, after it has received up-votes, and I verified with a YouTube link in a comment, that some people decide to take offense and mark the question as off-topic?

Seriously? I apparently provided enough information that somebody answered pretty quick (within a day?). The information I provided was pretty much all I remember as a kid when I saw this movie. But, I did provide a detail for a pretty meaningful scene near the end of the movie. The person answering the question specifically mentions that scene "really stuck with me".

I feel like if the question sat unanswered for days, then it might be ok to close it because the question is too vague. At the time of this post, not even 60 people saw the question. Yet here I sit with the answer to my question and I'm happy that "sfhq-sf" helped me out.

I get that stack exchange sites need to have moderators to keep the riff-raff from ruining everybody's favorite site, but give me a break! If somebody went the extra mile to help somebody else out, only to be rewarded by opinionated users admonishing the relevance of the question, then you're seriously going to lose users who genuinely want to help out AND lose users who really don't want to be told that their questions are not appreciated.