Timeline for Wondering about the criteria for downvoting
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2018 at 4:03 | vote | accept | Livrecache | ||
| Jan 14, 2018 at 4:03 | vote | accept | Livrecache | ||
| Jan 14, 2018 at 4:03 | |||||
| Jan 8, 2018 at 16:27 | comment | added | MmmHmm | It's really just up to the users discretion and may be as simple as indicating "I don't like this post" or "I disagree." That said, hover your cursor over the down arrow and it states a lack of research, clarity and usefulness as criteria. Likewise, upvoting may be as simple as "I like this." | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 14:14 | answer | added | Napoleon WilsonMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 7:28 | comment | added | steelersquirrel | I don't agree that question deserved a down vote, but that's just my opinion. Seems like a perfectly fine question to me. Don't worry too much about down votes. They will always happen with usually no explanation :) | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 7:13 | answer | added | Paulie_D | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 6:42 | comment | added | Nog Shine | It is simple. Less research effort or unclear question. That should be the reason for a downvote. The question you linked is deleted now. I'm wondering why it was deleted. | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 6:10 | history | asked | Livrecache | CC BY-SA 3.0 |