Skip to main content
replaced http://movies.stackexchange.com/ with https://movies.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Initially, the question was about a specific word's first use in a movie. Which in itself, while intriguing due to the subjet matter, is different from our other first occurences because asking about a specific word is getting to be a little too nit-picky as pointed out in the comments.

Secondly, part of it is from the fact that I had attempted to make it more general, using swearing in general, but as it turns out, there is actually an exact duplicateexact duplicate of another question.

I will be merging the two shortly.

Initially, the question was about a specific word's first use in a movie. Which in itself, while intriguing due to the subjet matter, is different from our other first occurences because asking about a specific word is getting to be a little too nit-picky as pointed out in the comments.

Secondly, part of it is from the fact that I had attempted to make it more general, using swearing in general, but as it turns out, there is actually an exact duplicate of another question.

I will be merging the two shortly.

Initially, the question was about a specific word's first use in a movie. Which in itself, while intriguing due to the subjet matter, is different from our other first occurences because asking about a specific word is getting to be a little too nit-picky as pointed out in the comments.

Secondly, part of it is from the fact that I had attempted to make it more general, using swearing in general, but as it turns out, there is actually an exact duplicate of another question.

I will be merging the two shortly.

deleted 65 characters in body
Source Link
Tablemaker Mod
  • 34.9k
  • 24
  • 43

Initially, the question was about a specific word's first use in a movie. Which in itself, while intriguing due to the subjet matter, is different from our other first occurences because asking about a specific word is getting to be a little too nit-picky as pointed out in the comments.

Secondly, part of it is from the fact that I had attempted to make it more general, using swearing in general, but as it turns out, there is actually an exact duplicate of another question.

You need only look in the comments from @stevvve and @Flimzy.

I will be merging the two shortly.

Initially, the question was about a specific word's first use in a movie. Which in itself, while intriguing due to the subjet matter, is different from our other first occurences because asking about a specific word is getting to be a little too nit-picky as pointed out in the comments.

Secondly, part of it is from the fact that I had attempted to make it more general, using swearing in general, but as it turns out, there is actually an exact duplicate of another question.

You need only look in the comments from @stevvve and @Flimzy.

I will be merging the two shortly.

Initially, the question was about a specific word's first use in a movie. Which in itself, while intriguing due to the subjet matter, is different from our other first occurences because asking about a specific word is getting to be a little too nit-picky as pointed out in the comments.

Secondly, part of it is from the fact that I had attempted to make it more general, using swearing in general, but as it turns out, there is actually an exact duplicate of another question.

I will be merging the two shortly.

Source Link
Tablemaker Mod
  • 34.9k
  • 24
  • 43

Initially, the question was about a specific word's first use in a movie. Which in itself, while intriguing due to the subjet matter, is different from our other first occurences because asking about a specific word is getting to be a little too nit-picky as pointed out in the comments.

Secondly, part of it is from the fact that I had attempted to make it more general, using swearing in general, but as it turns out, there is actually an exact duplicate of another question.

You need only look in the comments from @stevvve and @Flimzy.

I will be merging the two shortly.