Timeline for What's the deal with the serial upvoting?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2013 at 16:53 | comment | added | Napoleon Wilson | I wasn't really taking anyone as anything but rather providing general views on the topic, like your answer does. | |
| May 8, 2013 at 16:03 | comment | added | DForck42 Mod | @ChristianRau i think you're taking me as defending the person. I am just trying to illustrate what probably happened and why it was rolled back. I agree that it should be rolled back. | |
| May 8, 2013 at 15:45 | comment | added | Napoleon Wilson | Strange, but indeed possible. Well, it all amounts to how far one wants to balance between false-positives and insufficient detection, hard question though. | |
| May 8, 2013 at 15:41 | comment | added | DForck42 Mod | imagine this: you read through someone's list of questions, and you scroll click those into individual tabs to upvote en masse. once done, you go and upvote all of the ones you found interesting. | |
| May 8, 2013 at 14:30 | comment | added | Napoleon Wilson | But I would still doubt the validity of said user's actions, because he upvoted all of Dustin's 20 posts in 1 minute. But well, who knows if it wasn't a really fast reader in the end. | |
| May 8, 2013 at 13:50 | history | answered | DForck42Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |