I just recently noticed that the font color inside the tags behaves like links, which means the font color is the normal dark grey/light black when the corresponding link (i.e. the respective tag page) has not been visited yet. But once you click/visit that tag, it turns into a dark cyan blue font. This happens on the main site and on meta and seems to be a very recent "feature".

enter image description here enter image description here

Now first of all, I'd like to know if this is a feature at all or just a bug somehwere in the style sheet or whatever. Or maybe this just happens to me (on Firefox 37.0.2).

If it is actually supposed to be a feature, though, then I would question its validity, since it doesn't seem to be relevant if one has ever visited a tag's page and it just results in an inconsistent design for tags which suggests a semantic difference between the tags where there is none. It also seems to rob the tags of the nice contrast their rather greyish color made to the rest of the very cyan-heavy font colors of a questions list.

UPDATE: The same bug/feature seems to apply to those little light grey "modified/answered/asked X hours ago" thingies under the question title in the questions list, too. And as it is for tags, this different coloring is equally unnecessary and distracting there, too.

| |
  • This does not seem to be standard on any of the other SE sites I visit. I'm guessing it's a bug.... or maybe not, it's like that on Cooking.SE, too, now that I look closely. – Catija May 15 '15 at 20:03
  • Appear a weird feature to me, i didn't noticed it before. – Ankit Sharma May 18 '15 at 12:44
  • Ok, since noone seems to care about this, I finally went up a hierarchy level. – Napoleon Wilson May 29 '15 at 13:40
  • Hopefully they won't yell at you. Good thing I found the SA thing, though. – Catija May 29 '15 at 14:16
  • @Catija Well, if you answer right away before it gets annoying, you don't have to yell when it gets annoying. ;-) – Napoleon Wilson Jun 30 '15 at 11:33
  • The CSS A:Visited selector allows for marking a visited link separately from a un-visited link. Its useful! – cde Feb 5 '16 at 2:25
  • @cde But not in this case. What does it use to know you've once visited a tag? It seems much more distracting that way. – Napoleon Wilson Feb 5 '16 at 2:33
  • See ux.stackexchange.com/a/50729 – cde Feb 5 '16 at 2:39
  • 1
    @cde Well, then tell that to Meta Stack Exchange. As long as we're the only site doing that, it's clearly a bug. – Napoleon Wilson Feb 5 '16 at 2:46

Pushed a fix earlier today. Should be good now.

| |
  • Way to kill visited link css color differentiation. Now I can't tell which tags I've visited anymore :( – cde Feb 5 '16 at 2:21
  • 1
    @cde And why would you? – Napoleon Wilson Feb 5 '16 at 2:32

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .