Now I am going to say it up front, I am by no means someone one who academically nor professionally studies film so it would be good if someone who has actually participated in Film Studies weigh in on this.
First I would like to say that the following questions are indeed subjective
What is the main theme of The Dark Knight?
Captain Miller's thought process in Private Ryan "School Teacher" scene?
Is the opening break-up scene in The Social Network intended to be humorous?
How do the differences between the replicants and Deckard evolve in Blade Runner?
What fills the void left by the lack of character development in Inception?
Now the reason I decided to place these questions is to push towards analysis of the film though subjective, it is still analysis of the film in the eyes of the viewer. Let's look at the top voted questions currently (I am in no way attacking these questions but using them as examples),
Is there any definitive evidence that Teddy was or was not crazy?
As seen in the Inception answer we have two views. One that Nolan wanted to give. And one that the viewer as arrived at via observations of the film. One could say the ring reasoning is just a coincidence, though it is very convincing. What am I getting at? There is an opinion in there different from what Nolan originally intended and it should give us a deeper appreciation of the film.
It is actually the same thought process for Shutter Island, (interestingly the same actor). The point of Shutter Island was to again lead the audience in limbo.
So do these questions which you actually might end up seeing in your regular film critic review , which are subjective, be left off this site? And if they are, what are we really left with?
- Identify items (music,objects,names,rooms,origins of items,movie titles)
- Definition of movie/camera terms
- Director explanations for why the plot/adaptations turned out a certain way
I am open to not having subjective questions but at the same time it seems to this closes the scope a lot.
I would like to compare this to lit.stackexchange.com but I don't think it works. Works in books are descriptive, the writer uses words and phrases to ensure the reader gets the proper emotions and reasoning. This can be seen when many readers don't like how a film adaptation turns out. Because it is a certain view of how the book should be seen. (Hey this is my opinion, this could all be wrong)
Anyone care to me give me a little wisdom on subjectivity and film criticism and why it would not be a good for this site?