Here's the question.
I could understand this being closed as off-topic, since it is trivia, or as too localized, since it is extremely specific. But the "not constructive" rubric says "We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or specific expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion", which does not seem applicable. It produced no discussion at all, and any potential discussion could be quickly ended by the answer (which I know) and a reference (which I have).
I'm not suggesting it should be re-opened, but I am genuinely puzzled by the rationale for this particular disposition.