Timeline for Should we encourage swifter deletion of bad ID questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2017 at 12:39 | comment | added | Napoleon Wilson Mod | @MeatTrademark You don't close-vote rude or spam questions, you flag them, since they're actually unsalvagable and closing is a means for questions to get improved into validity before any attempts to answer them. | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:54 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://movies.stackexchange.com/ with https://movies.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:29 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:49 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.movies.stackexchange.com/ with https://movies.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:49 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.movies.stackexchange.com/ with https://movies.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 17, 2016 at 0:53 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
|
|
| Aug 15, 2016 at 10:32 | history | edited | Napoleon WilsonMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 17, 2016 at 14:00 | history | edited | Napoleon WilsonMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 4, 2016 at 19:36 | history | edited | Napoleon WilsonMod |
edited tags
|
|
| May 27, 2016 at 22:48 | answer | added | Torisuda | timeline score: 8 | |
| May 26, 2016 at 3:42 | comment | added | Meat Trademark | @randal'thor Is all that done here? I get Close review notices on questions 40 minutes old with no comment(s) left for OP. Leave a comment to help the person. And hey, give the person time to eat lunch or something; don't assume they know how fast people like to drop the hammer. VTC within an hour, unless it's a horrible question (esp rude or spam), seems trigger-happy. | |
| May 25, 2016 at 22:27 | comment | added | Rand al'Thor | @user568458 All of that is already being done here, but it's not having enough of an effect on quality control. | |
| May 25, 2016 at 15:09 | comment | added | user56reinstatemonica8 | On the Graphic Design site, which has similar issues with font identification questions, what used to be done was (maybe still is, but I'm not there so often these days so I'm not sure): a) a short list of criteria was written up, b) it was added to a popup on the tag on the question writing page, c) if someone missed or ignored that, the question was closed with a custom close reason listing the criteria, d) a friendly comment was added, linking to the long version of the criteria, like "Hi, we've got rules for these questions, please check [link] and edit your question then we'll re-open it" | |
| May 24, 2016 at 6:11 | comment | added | Ankit Sharma Mod | To me the current deletion process is enough because 3 day deletion process can create more chaos. | |
| May 24, 2016 at 1:27 | history | edited | cde | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| May 23, 2016 at 19:25 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackMovies/status/734827645515530240 | ||
| May 23, 2016 at 9:57 | comment | added | Rand al'Thor | @Walt Yes. This. Leaving a comment is always better than just silently nuking, as it helps the OP to understand why the action was taken. I almost always try to leave a comment when taking mod actions on SFF. | |
| May 23, 2016 at 9:54 | comment | added | Walt | Just wanted to add real quick that another counterargument is that it will alienate newcomers, so I suggest we be nice about it, even if we dislike ID. If you vote to close\delete, at least comment on the post, especially if it's a new user, to basically say that: sorry, the rules are a bit more strict in ID, but do try and stick around, we're not so bad, honest. Or something more official-sounding. ;) | |
| May 22, 2016 at 23:05 | history | asked | Rand al'Thor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |