Timeline for Bad policing and constant down-voting of questions with the [identify-this-movie] tag
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2016 at 16:06 | comment | added | Walt | @KutuluMike Er, AFAIK, VTCing does not make things 'fall off the front page'. Only a -4 score does. VTCs only put a Q 'on hold' (and you need 5 of them) and if it doesn't improve after a few days it's 'closed' - all while still very much on the front page. Finally, after like a month of no further improvement, it's deleted - and the front page has since changed plenty of times anyway. So I don't understand that reasoning at all. | |
| Jun 23, 2016 at 13:27 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Jun 23, 2016 at 11:14 | comment | added | KutuluMike | Your analysis of the first question is almost absurdly generous. "I saw a scene from a movie I am looking for now." does not describe where you saw it, and "it was in color and looked 70s or 80s" means it could be any time in the past 35 years, since plenty of movies look 70s or 80s on purpose. And yes, I am agressively VTC' bad ID questions so they will fall off the front page ASAP and discourage others from asking equally bad ones. | |
| Jun 23, 2016 at 8:30 | comment | added | Chanandler Bong | The Review Queue history is quite telling that people will blindly close vote any identity question. Not necessarily. It might also tell that most IDs are simply bad questions and in my opinion this is the actual reason of these 20+ closures you provided as an example. It is certainly the reason for my 4 closures on the list. I never blindly close anything, be it ID or not. | |
| Jun 23, 2016 at 7:22 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Jun 23, 2016 at 13:27 | |||||
| Jun 23, 2016 at 5:02 | history | edited | cde | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 283 characters in body
|
| Jun 23, 2016 at 2:56 | history | answered | cde | CC BY-SA 3.0 |