My question about Game of Thrones was down-voted and closed for being “opinion-based”, but I was invited to seek feedback and discussion here.
The suggested-order tag has a number of highly-voted questions, most of which appear to be at least somewhat opinion-based, so I’m not sure exactly what the problem with my question is in particular.
I didn’t intend to ask a question that solicits opinion-based answers. But if that’s how it comes across, I’d like to either try to fix it, or at least learn exactly what not to do next time.
The last season of Game of Thrones was received quite differently to the previous ones. Rotten Tomatoes rates each of the first seven seasons in the 90's (percent-wise), while Season 8 only got 55%. This suggests something significant changed.
I was hoping for fact-based answers concerning an abrupt change in something such as: the story, the writers/writting, that favourite characters were killed off, or perhaps something like the animated dragons being particularly unconvincing, etc. (I’m only guessing because I haven’t yet watched past Season 2).
Before my question was closed, an answer was posted that was more or less what I’m looking for. It goes to a constraint; the TV series caught up with and overtook the releases of the source material that it was based on (George RR Martin’s book series A Song of Ice and Fire). This corresponds to a marked change in the quality of the writing. As far as I can tell, it’s not at all an opinion-based answer.
What part of my question makes it seem “opinion-based”? Can this be fixed, and if so, how?